ABSTRACT
RAPD and ISSR marker systems were used for identification and
genetic diversity analysis of elite G.hirsutum, G. arboreum
and introgressed lines. PCR products were subjected to agarose gel
electrophoresis and the banding patterns were compared among 12 elite
cotton varieties of diploid , tetraploid and introgressed cotton. Out
of 20 random primers tested, 15 primers produced reproducible results
yielding 123 markers with 92 (74%) being polymorphic. The random
primer OPA 17 generated the maximum number of polymorphic markers
with a specific band of 300 base pairs for variety PA-255. Out of 55
ISSR primers tested, 15 were scorable, producing 101 marker bands
with 83 being polymorphic. The primer IS-08 generated the greatest
number of polymorphic markers. The ISSR markers were found to be more
reproducible and polymorphic than RAPD markers. Both ISSR and RAPD
techniques were thus found to be efficient methods for detecting DNA
polymorphism useful for cultivar identification and molecular
evaluation in cotton.
S.N.
Salunkhe, H.V. Kalpande, G.B. Khandagale, Department of Agricultural
Botany Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani 431 402 (M.S.)
India;
A.B.
Dongare, Principal Scientist, Plant Biotechnology, Central Institute
for Cotton Research, Panjri, Nagpur 440 010 (M.S.) India;
*Corresponding
author: hvkalpande@rediffmail.com
Cotton ‘the white gold’ is the world’s leading
natural fiber crop and it is the corner stone of textile industries
world wide. The cultivated cottons include Gossypium arboreum
(L) and Gossypium herbacium (L) (Old World species), both
diploid species with an AA genome native to southern Asia, Africa and
two allotetraploid species Gossypium barbadense(L) and
Gossypium hirsutum (L) (New World species) with AD genome from
Central, North and South America. Genetic diversity resulting from
interspecific introgression can be evaluated with morphological
characteristics, seed proteins, isozymes and DNA markers. To have
reliable estimates of genetic relationship, a large number of
polymorphic markers are required. This limits the use of
morphological characteristics and isozymes, which are few, or lack
adequate levels of polymorphism in Gossypium spp. Therefore
there is a need to study polymorphism at the DNA level which can be
indicative of genetic diversity in cotton. DNA markers have proven to
be valuable in crop breeding especially in studies of genetic
diversity and in cultivar identification. Polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) based molecular markers, e.g. ISSR, RAPD, SSR, STS, AFLP etc.
are useful for various applications in the plant breeding. Among
these, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Inter Simple
Sequence Repeat (ISSR) are arbitrary markers in which only one primer
is used. RAPD markers involve the amplification of random DNA
segments using arbitrary sequences of 10-15 base pairs without any
prior knowledge of DNA sequence. The ISSR technique involves
amplification of a DNA segment present at an amplifiable distance
between two identical microsatellite repeat regions oriented in
opposite strands. This technique uses microsatellites, usually 16 to
25 bp long, as primers in the single primer PCR reaction targeting
multiple genomic loci to amplify mainly the inter SSR sequences of
different size (Reddy et al., 2002). The primers used can be
repeats of di, tri, tetra or penta nucleotides anchored with one or
two base sequences at 3’or 5’ end (Zietkiewch et al.,
1994). Unanchored primers also can be used (Gupta et al.,
1994). ISSR are reproducible markers with 92-95 per cent efficiency
(Reddy et al., 2002).
The present molecular diversity analysis was carried out for
identification of elite cotton cultivars, to analyze genetic
relationship and genetic diversity of the cultivars.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
The list of elite
cotton cultivars used in the present study is as below.
Elite
G. hirsutum cultivars.
1. PH-93
2. PH-325 3. PH-348 4. NH-452 5. NH-545
Elite
G. arboreum cultivars.
1. PA-402
2. PA-255 3. PA-405
Elite
introgressed cultivars.
1. PAIG-
8/1 2. PAIG-27
Parents
of introgressed cultivars.
1. PA-140
(G. arboreum) 2. Poornima (G. hirsutum)
The
seeds of the above 12 cotton cultivars were obtained from the Cotton
Research Station, Nanded; Cotton Research Station, Mahboob Baugh
Farm; and the Cotton Research Scheme, Marathwada Agricultural
University, Parbhani. Total genomic DNA was extracted from 4gm of
bulked leaf sample sample by a modified procedure of Edwards (1991) in which 2% PVP (polyvinyl
pyrrolidone) was added to the DNA extraction buffer to avoid
co-isolation of phenolics and polysaccharidesin the DNA. A total of
20 primers from the OPA series from Operon Technologies, USA were
used for this study (OPA-1, OPA-2, OPA-3, OPA-4, OPA-5, OPA-6, OPA-7,
OPA-8, OPA-9, OPA-10, OPA-11, OPA-12, OPA-13, OPA-14, OPA-15, OPA-16,
OPA-17, OPA-18, OPA-19, OPA-20). A total of 55 ISSR primers from
Banglore Genie, India were used. Among them only 15 primers (IS-1,
IS-2, IS-3, IS-4, IS-5, IS-6, IS-7, IS-8, IS-9, IS-10, IS-11, IS-12,
IS-13, IS-14, IS-16) were scorable on 1.6 per cent agarose gel.
RAPD
Amplification.
RAPD amplification reaction was carried out with 25μl reaction
volume containing 40ng genomic DNA, 2.5 μl of reaction buffer (10X
Taq polymerase buffer with 15mM MgCl2), 200 μM
of each dNTPs (Q Biogene), and 20 ng of 10 Mer RAPD primers (from
Operon Technologies). Amplification was performed in a thermocycler
(Biometra UNO – Thermoblock). The reaction profile was
preceded by a single 94 oC soak for 6 minutes, 36 cycles
consisting each of a denaturing step of 45 seconds at 94 oC,
a primer annealing step of 1 minute at 36 oC and a primer
extension step of 1 minute at 72 oC. At the end of 36
cycles, a single 72 oC extension was applied for 10
minutes for polishing the ends of PCR products. All completed
reaction were held at 4 oC.
ISSR
Amplification.
ISSR amplification was performed in 25 μl reaction volume
containing 40 ng genomic DNA, 2.5 μl of reaction buffer (10X Taq
polymerase buffer with 15 mM MgCl2), 200 μM
of each dNTPs (Q -Biogene), 15 ng of ISSR primers (synthesized by
Bangalore Genie, India), 1.5 U Taq polymerase (3U/μl,
Bangalore Genie, India). The reaction profile was preceded by a
single 94oC soak for 5 minute, 45 cycles consisting each
of a denaturing step of 1 minute at 94oC, a primer
annealing step of 45 seconds at 49oC and a primer
extension step of 2 minutes at 72oC. At the end of 45
cycles, a single 72oC extension was applied for 5 minutes
for polishing the ends of PCR products. All completed reactions were
held at 4oC.
Amplified
products were separated on a 1.6 % agarose gel containing 0.1 μg/μl
of ethidium bromide for about 5 hours at 60 Volts. Gels were
photographed under UV light with a Tracktel GDS-2 gel documentation
system.Data analysis.
DNA fragment size was estimated by comparing the DNA bands against a
Lambda/ Hind III, pUC 18 /Sau 3A-pUC
18/ Taq I base pair ladder (Bangalore Genie, India). The
amplified DNA bands were scored on gel under a UV transilluminator as
1 for the presence and 0 for the absence of bands and assembled in
the data matrix table. The pair wise comparisons were calculated
using Nei and Li’s coefficient (1979). The similarity values
found were utilized to group individuals via the unweighted pair
group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA). NTSYS-PC (Rolf, 1993)
was used to perform all the analysis.
RESULTS
RAPD
analysis.
Out of 20 random OPA series primers, of, 15 produced reproducible
results (Table 1). These fifteen reproducible primers generated a
total 123 markers of which 92 were polymorphic i.e. 74 per cent
amplified loci were polymorphic. The average number of polymorphic
markers generated per primer was 6.13. The size of RAPD amplicons was
between 150 bp in OPA 06 and OPA 12 and 3000 bp in OPA 12, OPA 15,
OPA 16 and OPA 17.
Highly
polymorphic profiles were obtained with 10 of the total primers used
such as OPA 06, OPA 17 and OPA 19. These 10 primers detected 79
polymorphic markers. However, none of the primers individually was so
informative as to differentiate all the genotypes. The random primer
OPA 17 generated the maximum number of markers i.e. 16 and OPA 03
generated the least number of markers (Table 2). The primer OPA 17
showed a specific band of 3000 bp for the cultivar
PA-255 (Plate 1a).
The primer OPA 16 generated 7 polymorphic markers and 3 monomorphic
markers. OPA 16 also generated a specific band of 700 bp for the
cultivar PA-255 (Plate 1b).
ISSR
analysis.
Initially
55 ISSR primers were screened, of these 15 primers (IS-1, IS-2, IS-3,
IS-4, IS-5, IS-6, IS-7, IS-8, IS-9, IS-10, IS-11, IS-12, IS-13,
IS-14, IS-16) were scorable on 1.6 per cent agarose gel were
scorable. A total of 101 ISSR markers were amplified, out of which 83
were polymorphic (82.1%). Average number of polymorphic loci
amplified per primer was 5.5. The results obtained from ISSR-PCR
analysis are presented in Table 3. The size of ISSR amplicons was
between 100 bp in IS 09 to 3000 bp in IS 07. The number of
polymorphic markers generated by each ISSR primer are given in Table
4. The ISSR primer IS 16 generated the least number of markers (3).
The maximum number of polymorphic markers (12)was generated by IS 8
(Plate 2a).
Highly polymorphic profiles were obtained with 9 of the primers used
viz., IS 4, IS 5, IS 6, IS 7, IS 8, IS 9, IS 11, IS 12 and IS 14.
None of the primers individually was so informative as to
differentiate all the cultivars. Primers IS 7 and IS 8 were
polymorphic in all the cultivars. IS 7 generated a specific band of
800 bp for the cultivar PH 93 and another of 585 bp for cultivar PH
348 (Plate 2b).
IS 9 produced a specific band of 1 kb for cultivar PA 140 (Plate
2c).
Introgression
Study
These two
introgression cultivars were developed from interspecific crosses
between G. arboreum (PA-140) and G. hirsutum (Poornima).
Polyploidy was induced in the diploid cotton species G.
arboreum(2n=26) by colchicine treatment prior to their being
crossed with G. hirsutum(2n=52). To recover the maximum genes
from G. arboreum, the resultant F1 was then back
crossed with 4n G. arboreum in the C4 generation.
PAIG 8/1 and PAIG-27 are the selection lines from back crossed
F1 populations (Deshpande and Baig, 2002). Since the
maximum number of genes of G .arboreum have been recovered in
the introgressed cultivars, these showed the highest level of genetic
similarity with G. arboreum; although a few genes like those
for fibre quality, boll size and ginning outturn have been
introgressed from G.hirsutum.
RAPD
analysis.
Two
introgressed cultivars PAIG-8/1 and PAIG –27 and their parents
Poornima (G.hirsutum) and PA-140 (G.arboreum) were
analyzed for detecting introgression using 20 RAPD primers (Table 5).
The number of parent specific bands present in both introgressed
cultivars shows that they have the greatest homology with parent PA
140. Primer OPA 12 showed a specific band of 750 bp which is present
in both introgressed cultivars and the parent Poornima (Plate 3a).
The primer OPA 6 revealed a 1500 bp band in both introgressed
cultivars which is specific to the parent Poornima (Plate 3b). The
primer OPA 17 revealed a 800bp band in both cultivars which is
specific to parent Poornima but absent in parent PA 140
(Plate 3c).
ISSR
analysis.
The ISSR analysis revealed that both introgressed cultivars had more
specific band homology with parent PA-140 (9), only one specific band
for Poornima was generated by the primer IS-14 (Table 6). The primer
IS-14 generated a 800bp band in both introgressed cultivars which is
specific to parent Poornima (Plate 3d).
These two analyses make it clear that the introgressed cultivars PAIG
8/1 and PAIG-27 are more similar to PA-140 than the G. hirsutum
parent Poornima.
Cluster
Analysis.
RAPD.
Nei and
Li’s (1979) similarity coefficient between 12 cotton cultivers
using RAPD markers ranged from 0.5 to 0.92. G. arboreum
cultivar PA-255 and the introgressed cultivar PAIG-8/1were highly
similar. Similarly, a high degree of similarity was evident between
cultivar PA-405 (G. arboreum) and PA-402 (G. arboreum).
Maximum RAPD diversity was evident between the introgressed cultivar
PAIG 27 and G. arboreum varieties such as PA-405 and PA-402. A
dendrogram resulting from cluster analysis based on similarity values
of 12 cotton cultivars generated from RAPD data (Fig 1) revealed
that the12 cotton cultivars could be separated into 2 major groups (I
and II). The first major group consisted of 6 G. hirsutum
cultivars and the second major group consisted of the 4 G.
arboreum cultivars and the 2 introgressed lines. Each of these
major groups could be further subdivided. In group I, 2 G.
hirsutum cultivars, NH-545 and PH-93, clustered separately from
rest of the G. hirsutum cultivars viz., PH-325, PH-348,
Poornima and NH 452. In group II, the 4 G. arboreum cultivars
and the introgressed cultivar PAIG-8/1 clustered separately from the
cultivar PAIG-27.
ISSR.
Nei and
Li’s (1979) similarity coefficient between 12 cotton cultivars
using ISSR markers ranged from 0.49 to 0.93. G.hirsutum
cultivars PH 325, NH 452 and Poornima were highly similar. Moreover,
high similarity was found between the two introgressed cultivars PAIG
–8/1 and PAIG-27. Maximum ISSR diversity was evident between
PA-402 (G. arboreum) and the G. hirsutum varieties PH
325, NH 425 and Poornima. A dendogram based upon cluster analysis of
similarity coefficients from the ISSR analysis revealed the same two
major groups (I and II) as that of RAPD analysis (Figure 2).
The only difference was that in group I, 5 G. hirsutum
cultivars: NH 545, PH 93, PH 325, NH 425 and Poornima clustered
separately from the G. hirsutum cultivar PH 348. In group II,
the 2 introgressed cultivars PAIG 8 /1, PAIG 27 and 3 G. arboreum
cultivars: PA 405, PA 140 and PA 402 clustered separately from the
G. arboreum variety PA 255.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, 20 RAPD and 55 ISSR markers were used for
identification and genetic diversity analysis of 12 elite cotton
cultivars. In order to apply molecular techniques for cultivar
identification one needs to know the level of polymorphism revealed
by the different techniques in the species under study. Due to lack
of abundant intra-specific polymorphism in cotton, only seven
cultivars
were analysed in this study. No unique marker was observed for the
rest of the cultivars. This is similar to the results of Chowdhary et
al. (2002) who were able to identify only 6 chickpea cultivar
specific markers out of 19 cultivars studied due to low level of
intra-specific polymorphism in chickpea. However, the marker profiles
of the 12 cultivars produced by 15 RAPD and 15 ISSR primers were
different from each other. This indicated that cotton cultivars that
are indistinguishable by cultivar specific markers could still be
differentiated by a profile generated from several markers..
On
average, RAPD primers revealed more bands than ISSR primers. However,
the level of polymorphism was higher using ISSR primers than RAPD
primers (Tables 2 and 4). A higher level of polymorphism for ISSR
compared to RAPD primers was reported in chickpea (Chowdhari et
al., 2002) and in citrus (Fung and Roose, 1997). Reproducibility
of the ISSR markers was found to be greater than that of RAPD
markers. We feel, therefore, that ISSR markers are superior to RAPD
markers in cotton in term of cost and speed. Yang et al. (1996)
in their comparison of DNA marker systems report a lower relative
cost and time for ISSR’s than RAPDs.
Both RAPD
and ISSR markers clustered the G. hirusutum and G. arboreum
cultivars into separate groups. Iqbal et al. (1997) also found
distinct cluster formation of accessions belonging to G. hirsutum
and G .arboreum groups except for one variety based on RAPD
analysis. Although two separate groups are formed but there are
differences in the intra-hirsutum and intra-arboreum clusters
(Figures 1 and 2). The cultivar PH-348, a G. hirsutum genotype
is most diverse from the other G. hirsutum cultivars based on
ISSR markers. But based on RAPD markers PH-348 grouped closely to
PH-325 (G. hirsutum). Two introgressed cultivars PAIG-8/1 and
PAIG-27 also clustered in the G. arboreum group.
REFERENCES
Chowdhary, M.A, B. Vanderberg, and T. Workentin. 2002. Cultivar
identification and genetic relationship among selected breeding lines
and cultivars in chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.). Euphytica.,
127:317-325.
Deshpande, L.A. and K.S. Baig. 2002. Interspecific transfer of
favorable genes from Gossypium hirsutum into G.arboreum
and cytomorphological studies of introgressed genotypes. 12th
Austral Asian Plant Breeding Conference. September, 2002.
Edwards, K.C., Johnstone and C. Thomspon. 1991. A simple and rapid
method for preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic
Acids Res., 19 (6): 1349.
Fung, D.Q. and M.L. Roose. 1997. Identification of closely related
citrus cultivars with ISSR markers. Theor. Appl. Genet., 95:408-417.
Gupta, M; Y.S. Chyi, J. Romero-Severson and J.L. Owen. 1994.
Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionarily diverse genomes
using single primers of simple sequence repeats Theor. Appl. Genet.,
89:998-1006.
Iqbal, M.J., N.Aziz, N.A. Saeed, Y. Zafar and K.A. Malik. 1997.
Genetic diversity evaluation of some elite cotton varieties by RAPD
analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet., 94:139-144.
Nei, N. and W. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic
variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci., USA, 76:5263-5273.
Reddy, M.P., N. Sarla and E.A. Siddique. 2002. Inter simple sequence
repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding.
Euphytica., 128:9-17.
Zietkiewich, E, A. Rafalski and D. Labuda. 1994. Genome finger
printing by simple sequence repeat (SSR) anchored polymerase chain
reaction amplification. Genomics., 20:176-183.
Table 1.
Result obtained from RAPD analysis of 12 Gossypium varieties
RAPD Analysis | Observation |
Total number of Primers used | 20 |
Number of reproducible primers | 15 |
Total number of bands amplified from reproducible primers | 123 |
Total number of polymorphic bands identified | 92 |
Average number of polymorphic bands per reproducible primer | 6.13 |
Percentage of polymorphic bands | 74 |
Size range of amplified products | 150-3000bp |
Table 2.
List of RAPD primers used, their sequence and level of polymorphism
detected among 12 cotton genotypes studied
Primer | Primer sequences 5’-3’ | Markers generated | Polymorphic marker |
OPA 01 | 5’-CAGGCCCTTC-3’ | 4 | 3 |
OPA 02 | 5’-TGCCGACGTG-3’ | 3 | 2 |
OPA 03 | 5’-AGTCAGCCAC-3’ | 1 | 0 |
OPA 04 | 5’-AATCGGGCTG-3’ | N R | |
OPA 05 | 5’-AGGGGTCTTG-3’ | N R | |
OPA 06 | 5’-GGTCCCTGAC-3’ | 9 | 9 |
OPA 07 | 5’-GAAACGGGTG-3’ | 9 | 8 |
OPA 08 | 5’-GTGACGTAGG-3’ | 6 | 4 |
OPA 09 | 5’-GGGTAACGCC-3’ | N S | |
OPA 10 | 5’-GTGATCGCGC-3’ | 13 | 9 |
OPA 11 | 5’-CAATCGCCGT-3’ | 11 | 10 |
OPA 12 | 5’-TCGGCGATAG-3’ | 8 | 5 |
OPA 13 | 5’-CAGCACCCAC-3’ | 5 | 5 |
OPA 14 | 5’-TCTGTGGCGG-3’ | N S | |
OPA 15 | 5’-TTCCGAACCC-3’ | 10 | 5 |
OPA 16 | 5’-AGCCAGCGAA-3’ | 10 | 7 |
OPA 17 | 5’-GACCGCTTGT-3’ | 16 | 12 |
OPA 18 | 5’-AGGTGACCGT-3’ | N R | |
OPA 19 | 5’-CAAACGTCGG-3’ | 12 | 9 |
OPA 20 | 5’-GTTGCGATCC-3’ | 6 | 4 |
Total | | 123(100%) | 92(74%) |
NR –
Non reproducible, NS – Non scorable
Table 3.
Result obtained from ISSR analysis of 12 Gossypium varieties
ISSR Analysis | Observation |
Total number of Primers used | 55 |
Number of scorable primers | 15 |
Total number of bands amplified from reproducible primers | 101 |
Total number of polymorphic bands identified | 83 |
Average number of polymorphic bands per reproducible primer | 5.5 |
Percentage of polymorphic bands | 82.1 |
Size range of amplified products | 100-3000bp |
Table 4.
List of ISSR primers used, level of polymorphism detected among 12
cotton genotypes studied
Primer Code | Markers generated | Polymorphic marker |
IS-1 | 4 | 3 |
IS-2 | 6 | 4 |
IS-3 | 4 | 3 |
IS-4 | 7 | 6 |
IS-5 | 10 | 9 |
IS-6 | 7 | 6 |
IS-7 | 8 | 8 |
IS-8 | 12 | 12 |
IS-9 | 9 | 7 |
IS-11 | 7 | 5 |
IS-12 | 6 | 4 |
IS-13 | 8 | 6 |
IS-14 | 6 | 5 |
IS-15 | 4 | 3 |
IS-16 | 3 | 2 |
| Total=101(100%) | Total=83(82.1%) |
Table
5. Parent specific bands generated by introgressed lines by RAPD
analysis
Primer | Introgressed variety PAIG-8/1 | Parent-1 (Poornima)Specific band | Parent-2 (PAI40) specific band | Introgressed variety PAIG-27 | Parent-1 (Poornima) Specific band | Parent-2 (PA-140) Specifier band |
OPA17 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 3 |
OPA10 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
OPA06 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
OPA08 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
OPA12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 2 |
OPA15 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
OPA16 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
OPA11 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
TOTAL | 42 | 5 | 13 | 39 | 5 | 12 |
Table 6. Parent specific bands generated by introgressed lines by
ISSR analysis
Primer | Introgressed variety PAIG-8/1 | Parent-1 (Poornima)Specific band | Parent-2 (PAI40) specific band | Introgressed variety PAIG-27 | Parent-1 (Poornima) Specific band | Parent-2 (PA-140) Specific band |
IS-01 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
IS-14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
IS-07 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
IS-09 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
IS-12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
IS-15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
IS-03 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
IS-13 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
Total | 21 | 1 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 9 |
14