
	Cotton is an important	commercial crop grown extensively in India under rainfed as well as	in irrigated ecosystem. Cotton occupies an area of 9.16 m.ha with	the production of 270 lakh bales. However, the productivity is	significantly lower (501 kg/ ha) as compared to world average. The	decline in cotton productivity is mainly due to retention of less	number of squares, flowers and bolls and in turn affected cotton	productivity. Among several constraints, micronutrients play an	important role in changing growth and physiological characteristics	of cotton. Boron (B) has been universally recognized as the most	important micronutrient for cotton production. Its deficiency in	cotton may cause small, deformed bolls; poor fruit retention; and	reduced lint yields. Relatively small amounts of B are required to	support the processes of growth and development of cotton fibers in	the boll. The information pertaining to use of boron as foliar spray	is not common among the farmers. Thus the trial was conducted to	demonstrate Solubor, a high Boron containing product for increased	yield and quality of cotton.	 	Field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station,	Malnoor, University of agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka,	India, under irrigation in medium deep black soil. The soil chemical	properties of experimental site viz., pH (7.95), EC (0.25 dS/m),	Available Nitrogen (180 kg/ha), Available P2O5	(12.60 kg/ha), Available K2O (480 kg/ha) and hot water	soluble boron (0.56 ppm) were analyzed following the standard	methods (Page et al., 1982). The treatments were laid-out in	randomized complete block design with three replications and crop	was supplied with the Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (120: 60: 60 N:	P2O5: K2O kg/ha). Solubor was	sprayed thrice as per the treatments (Table 1) over an area of 18.90	m2 at 15 days interval from square formation stage	onwards. The observations on number of flowers formed and dropped	per plant, number of bolls formed and dropped per plant, yield	(q/ha) and quality parameters of cotton were recorded.	 	The number of flowers formed per plant did not show significant	difference. Whereas, number of flowers dropped per plant differed	significantly. Number of flowers dropped was low (3.53 to 4.6	flowers/ plant) in solubor and borax treated plots as compared to	control (8.20 flowers dropped/ plant). However number of flowers	dropped per plant were on par with each other due to spray of	solubor and borax at all the doses. Similarly, number of bolls	formed per plant did not show significant difference. Whereas, the	number of bolls dropped per plant differed significantly. The number	of bolls dropped per plant was significantly lower (2.46) with	foliar spray of solubor @ 1.125 g per l of water, which was on par	with spraying borax @ 2.714 g per l (3.00) and @ 2.036 g per l	(3.20). The results are in conformity with the findings of Rosolem	and Costa (2000).	 	Cotton yield differed significantly at any level of solubor and	borax spray. Higher cotton yield (24.52 q/ha) was obtained by	spraying solubor @ 1.125 g per l of water as compared to the rest of	the treatments. The yield increased is attributed to increased	photosynthetic rate and better translocation of photosynthates from	source to sink (Duli zhao and Derrick, 2003).	 	Similarly, the effect of solubor on quality of cotton is furnished	here	 	Mean fibre length: staple length was not influenced significantly	with the different levels of solubor and borax spray.	 	Uniformity ratio: foliar application has no considerable influence	on uniformity ratio. In general the uniformity ratio was average to	good.	 	Fibre fineness: solubor at all levels of application has improved	the fibre fineness over borax spray and control. The micronaire	values ranged between 3 and 3.9 (fine quality).	 	Maturity co-efficient: Borax @ 2.714 g per plant resulted in higher	maturity co-efficient (79.41%) over control and other levels of	borax and solubor. Maturity co-efficient are classified under	average maturity.	 	Trash: Non-lint content was 2 per cent and it is classed under II	grade.	 	Application of borax @ 2.714 g per l and also solubor at all levels	improved fibre length and maturity co-efficient, which can be	attributed to better translocation of photosynthates from source to	sink. The results are in conformity with the findings of Christos	Dordas (2006).	 	The results obtained indicate that, solubor spray (1.125 and 1.875	g/l) improved the cotton yield by reducing flower and boll drop as	compared to control and borax spray. The quality of cotton was not	much influenced by foliar application.	 	Christos Dordas, 2006. Foliar boron application affects lint and	seed yield and improves seed quality of cotton grown on calcareous	soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 76 (1): 19-28.	 	Duli Zhao and Derrick M. Oosterhuis. 2003.	Cotton Growth and Physiological Responses to Boron Deficiency. J. of	plant nutr., 26(4): 855-867.	 	Page, A.L., R.H. Millar, and D.R. Keeney. 1982. Methods of soil	analysis Part-2. American Society of Agronomy/ Soil Science Society	of America, Madison, WI, USA	 	Rosolem, C. A. and A. Costa. 2000. Cotton growth and boron	distribution in the plant as affected by a temporary deficiency of	boron. J. of plant nutr., 23(6): 1-2.
	
|  | No. of flowers formed/ plant | No. of flowers dropped/ plant | No. of bolls formed/ plant | No. of bolls dropped/ plant | Yield (q/ha) | 
| T1 – Control (RDF only)* | 53.76 | 8.20 | 40.42 | 4.93 | 18.10b | 
| T2 – T1+solubor spray @ 1.5 g/l of water | 53.86 | 4.00 | 46.46 | 3.73 | 20.73ab | 
| T3 – T1+solubor spray @ 1.875 g/l of water | 53.00 | 3.53 | 47.26 | 3.46 | 23.00ab | 
| T4 – T1+solubor spray @ 1.125 g/l of water | 53.66 | 4.26 | 47.60 | 2.46 | 24.52a | 
| T5 – T1+Borax spray @ 2.714 g/l of water | 52.80 | 4.20 | 45.00 | 3.00 | 22.32ab | 
| T6 – T1+Borax spray @ 3.393 g/l of water | 53.60 | 4.00 | 45.60 | 3.60 | 21.65ab | 
| T7 – T1+Borax spray @ 2.036 g/l of water | 52.66 | 4.60 | 47.66 | 3.20 | 21.93ab | 
| S.Em± | 1.60 | 0.567 | 1.99 | 0.286 | 
 | 
| CD (0.05) | NS | 1.748 | NS | 0.881 | 
 | 
* RDF: Recommended Dose of Fertilizer
* Yield was analyzed in DMRT
|  | Span 2.5% (mm.) | Length 50% (mm.) | Mean (mm.) | Length (inch) | Uniformity ratio | Fineness (micronaire) | Maturity co-efficient |  | 
| T1 – Control (RDF only)* | 23.04 | 10.42 | 21.30 | 27/32 | 45.22 | 3.17 | 75.70 | 2.0 | 
| T2 – T1+solubor spray @ 1.5 g/l of water | 23.43 | 10.79 | 21.60 | 27/32 | 46.08 | 3.16 | 74.76 | 2.0 | 
| T3 – T1+solubor spray @ 1.875 g/l of water | 23.18 | 10.70 | 21.30 | 27/32 | 46.36 | 3.05 | 77.04 | 2.0 | 
| T4 – T1+solubor spray @ 1.125 g/l of water | 24.02 | 10.89 | 22.10 | 28/32 | 45.35 | 3.07 | 74.10 | 2.0 | 
| T5 – T1+Borax spray @ 2.714 g/l of water | 23.46 | 11.14 | 21.90 | 28/32 | 47.49 | 3.40 | 79.41 | 2.0 | 
| T6 – T1+Borax spray @ 3.393 g/l of water | 23.41 | 10.56 | 21.60 | 27/32 | 45.13 | 2.82 | 69.14 | 2.0 | 
| T7 – T1+Borax spray @ 2.036 g/l of water | 23.39 | 11.18 | 21.60 | 27/32 | 47.80 | 3.15 | 74.60 | 2.0 | 
* RDF: Recommended Dose of Fertilizer